<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Announces $1B Revenue Share Program with YOU!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 05:48:19 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Google Jostles for Controlling Share of Internet&#160;-&#160;Cocoliso</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/comment-page-1/#comment-72079</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Google Jostles for Controlling Share of Internet&#160;-&#160;Cocoliso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 03:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/#comment-72079</guid>
		<description>[...] Karr recently called for a new search engine with a new model. He had his own reasons for doing so, but it got me thinking. I think that&#8217;s what we need. A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Karr recently called for a new search engine with a new model. He had his own reasons for doing so, but it got me thinking. I think that&#8217;s what we need. A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Schinkel</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/comment-page-1/#comment-72052</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schinkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/#comment-72052</guid>
		<description>Also, very relevant here: my favorite book (ever?) &quot;&lt;em&gt;New Rules for the New Economy&lt;/em&gt;&quot; by Kevin Kelley talks about how the &quot;superwinners&quot; gain from the &quot;winner-take-most&quot; environment of the network economy in &lt;a title=&quot;Chapter 2 of &#039;New Rules for the New Economy&#039; by Kevin Kelley&quot; href=&quot;http://kk.org/newrules/newrules-2.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chapter 2&lt;/a&gt; which you can read online.  It (and the whole book) are definitely worth a read.  Oh, BTW, it was written before Google even existed (or at least before they were well known.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, very relevant here: my favorite book (ever?) &#8220;<em>New Rules for the New Economy</em>&#8221; by Kevin Kelley talks about how the &#8220;superwinners&#8221; gain from the &#8220;winner-take-most&#8221; environment of the network economy in <a href="http://kk.org/newrules/newrules-2.html"title="Chapter 2 of 'New Rules for the New Economy' by Kevin Kelley"  rel="nofollow">Chapter 2</a> which you can read online.  It (and the whole book) are definitely worth a read.  Oh, BTW, it was written before Google even existed (or at least before they were well known.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Schinkel</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/comment-page-1/#comment-72050</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Schinkel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/#comment-72050</guid>
		<description>The crows come home to roost!  Heh!  

I&#039;ve been &lt;a title=&quot;Is Google becoming a Monopoly?&quot; href=&quot;http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blog/isgooglebecomingamonopoly/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wary of Google for a while&lt;/a&gt;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crows come home to roost!  Heh!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been <a href="http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blog/isgooglebecomingamonopoly/"title="Is Google becoming a Monopoly?"  rel="nofollow">wary of Google for a while</a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Business Marketing</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/comment-page-1/#comment-72036</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Business Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/#comment-72036</guid>
		<description>Both Google and Yahoo for that matter have imposed a set of rules on users that benefit only Google and Yahoo and not the community of users.  Obviously you&#039;re right...the Internet and the content placed on it by the users belong to the users, not to the directories and to the search engines.  The challenge is that as usual, the monetizing aspect is what drives the system and as long as there are those trying to take advantage of getting a quick buck, they will have the upper hand unless government...that bad word...steps in...go figure.

Thanks for speaking up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Google and Yahoo for that matter have imposed a set of rules on users that benefit only Google and Yahoo and not the community of users.  Obviously you&#8217;re right&#8230;the Internet and the content placed on it by the users belong to the users, not to the directories and to the search engines.  The challenge is that as usual, the monetizing aspect is what drives the system and as long as there are those trying to take advantage of getting a quick buck, they will have the upper hand unless government&#8230;that bad word&#8230;steps in&#8230;go figure.</p>
<p>Thanks for speaking up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sergey Rusak</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/comment-page-1/#comment-72032</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergey Rusak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/#comment-72032</guid>
		<description>I read a lot of bad articles when people complain about Google paid links policy and organic rankings.&#039;
 This article is the only one which explains a lot bringing real facts.
 From my side I would like to support everything you are saying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a lot of bad articles when people complain about Google paid links policy and organic rankings.&#8217;<br />
 This article is the only one which explains a lot bringing real facts.<br />
 From my side I would like to support everything you are saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alanj878</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/comment-page-1/#comment-72029</link>
		<dc:creator>alanj878</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/12/30/google-announces-1b-revenue-share-program-with-you/#comment-72029</guid>
		<description>I never heard of the metacafe before having an affiliate program I heard of revver  shared revenue program that this month I made almost $40, which is more than I made in Google adsense go figure. I believe google should have shared content for organic results and also believe they should monetize youtube for the whole public instead of a few selected particpaants</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never heard of the metacafe before having an affiliate program I heard of revver  shared revenue program that this month I made almost $40, which is more than I made in Google adsense go figure. I believe google should have shared content for organic results and also believe they should monetize youtube for the whole public instead of a few selected particpaants</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
