<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Interactive Marketing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/09/10/interactive-marketing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/09/10/interactive-marketing/</link>
	<description>new media strategies and other marketing gems</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:14:21 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Karr</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/09/10/interactive-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-285204</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Karr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 20:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/09/10/interactive-marketing/#comment-285204</guid>
		<description>Eric,

This is so true... very few sites actually are interactive.  That&#039;s why companies are looking to social media to solve the issue.  It&#039;s a safe &#039;third place&#039;.  I don&#039;t believe that companies should go so far as to run their own social networks - we&#039;ve seen that fail.  I do believe they should create a conversation on their page.

Thanks for adding to this conversation!
Doug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,</p>
<p>This is so true&#8230; very few sites actually are interactive.  That&#8217;s why companies are looking to social media to solve the issue.  It&#8217;s a safe &#8216;third place&#8217;.  I don&#8217;t believe that companies should go so far as to run their own social networks &#8211; we&#8217;ve seen that fail.  I do believe they should create a conversation on their page.</p>
<p>Thanks for adding to this conversation!<br />
Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ellis</title>
		<link>http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/09/10/interactive-marketing/comment-page-1/#comment-56690</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marketingtechblog.com/2007/09/10/interactive-marketing/#comment-56690</guid>
		<description>I like the fishing metaphor.  Very relevant and true.  I&#039;ve too have seen interactive marketing used in the wrong context.  Do a &quot;define:&quot; query in Google and you&#039;ll get the idea.  

It seems the term &quot;interactive&quot; is now synonymous with the Web.  Ironically enough, most websites aren&#039;t truly interactive.  Clicking through a bunch of hyperlinks, while not necessarily ineffective, isn&#039;t really an interactive experience IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the fishing metaphor.  Very relevant and true.  I&#8217;ve too have seen interactive marketing used in the wrong context.  Do a &#8220;define:&#8221; query in Google and you&#8217;ll get the idea.  </p>
<p>It seems the term &#8220;interactive&#8221; is now synonymous with the Web.  Ironically enough, most websites aren&#8217;t truly interactive.  Clicking through a bunch of hyperlinks, while not necessarily ineffective, isn&#8217;t really an interactive experience IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
